1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the money ordered to be paid below is revoked.

1. Under the following, the lower court concluded a contract for design, construction and supervision with the Plaintiff, the Defendant, the Plaintiff’s Intervenor (hereinafter referred to as the “Supplementary Intervenor”) and the Samdo Construction Co., Ltd. (Seoul District Court Decision 2009 Mahap15) regarding the instant construction (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction”) as follows:

(1) On May 18, 2001, the Plaintiff et al. (hereinafter referred to as “contractors”). On May 18, 2001, Defendant 431,229,00 on May 24, 2001, to October 23, 2001, the Intervenor, the Rehabilitation Company (joint supply system), the Rehabilitation Company (joint supply system), the 360 days after the start of the first 365-day supervision service contract, and the Plaintiff et al. were installed at the 360-day regional storage pumps and the 4,000-day regional storage pumps and the 365-day regional storage pumps, which were located in the Seo-gu, Incheon. 4, 201, and the 360-day regional storage pumps and the 4,000-day regional storage pumps were installed on December 30, 204.

On September 25, 2009, after the completion of the instant construction, Piping phenomena in the basin: The water-level difference in the inside and outside of the bank, and the water length pressure in the water surface inside and outside the bank, making a water flow in the pipe form in the bank underground, and the ground has been destroyed as earth was destroyed as the ground has been destroyed due to the storming of the earth and sand, which led to the collapse of the embankment adjacent to the coast, using the bank and the embankment outside of the drainage pipe, and there is a common phenomenon caused by some earth and sand erosion on the shore.