logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2018.02.08 2017고단1442
사기미수등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From November 2012, the Defendant, from around 2012, invested a cosmetic with the trade name “D” in the Victim C and the Philippines, but following the process of arranging the above cosmetic around June 2016, the dispute arose with the victim and the return of investment money, and the victim filed a civil lawsuit against the victim, and the victim did not prepare a written agreement with the victim, but did not intend to arbitrarily prepare a written agreement and submit it to the court as if the Defendant lent KRW 300 million to the victim.

1. From around March 2016 to March 2017, the Defendant: (a) using a computer located in the north-gu E apartment house at port at port and in the place of residence of the Defendant located in the 103 dong 804, the Defendant agreed that “The husband and wife (her husband and wife F; hereinafter the husband and wife G/C; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the married couple (her husband and wife G/C; hereinafter the same shall apply) are as follows; (b) the married couple incorporates a juristic person with KRW 100 million in capital in an cosmetic beauty business (Pass. 30 million in capital; (c) the couple’s husband and wife shall lend the same couple’s income each month; and (d) the couple shall settle the profits of the Switzerland company at the end of the end of the end of the month and pay 50% of the net profits to the husband and wife; and (e) the married couple shall stay in the management and operation of the cosmetic and employees of the cosmetic.

After indicating the purport that this agreement is “the substitution of all contracts and commitments under this agreement according to a monetary transaction between the family members,” the same couple stated “C” as “C” and affixed a seal prepared in advance to the same couple, thereby forging a copy of the agreement under the name of the Dong, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On March 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) submitted to the 181 Daegu District Court (Seoul District Court 768) the preparation for the loan payment claim lawsuit against C at the 181 Daegu District Court’s Pohang-si branch; (b) and (c) submitted the forged agreement as prescribed in paragraph (1) of the said Article.

arrow