logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.04.25 2018나2060718
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) shall be from the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) on 304,700.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, inasmuch as the reasoning of the judgment is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the parts cited or added in paragraph (2)

2. Following the 7th 7th 3rd 7th 7th 201, “with the Defendant operating a building material manufacturing business, real estate development business, etc.”

The 3rd 10th 10 parts of “A” shall be considered as “A building to be newly constructed on the ground and on the ground.”

In five pages, the following parts of the box “not the Defendant” are as follows:

The Defendant did not pay the Plaintiffs a total of KRW 25,300,000 of the rent for 11-month from March 2016 to December 2016 and the rent for 11-month from March 2017. Thereafter, from April 2017 to September 2018, Defendant continued to pay the amount equivalent to the rent. However, from October 2018 to September 2018, Defendant did not pay the above amount equivalent to the rent for 6 8th.”

The entry from 7 pages 4 to 11 shall be as follows:

“2) As seen earlier, the Defendant’s failure to pay a total of KRW 25,300,000 for the 11-month rent. Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the above overdue rent and damages for delay to the Plaintiffs who inherited the lessor’s status, barring any special circumstances.

(However, as seen below, the above overdue rent is to be deducted from the lease deposit to be paid by the plaintiffs to the defendant. 10th below the lower end of the 10th page of "The above overdue rent is to be added."

arrow