logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.07.12 2018누43578
이축불허가처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition of some contents as follows. Thus, it is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420

In addition, two pages 1 shall add “area Confirmation” to “area Confirmation”. The following shall be added to the following 3 pages 1:

E. The Plaintiff was dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed an administrative appeal seeking the revocation of the instant disposition with the Gyeonggi-do Administrative Appeals Commission, but was dismissed on August 21, 2017.

3. The basis for the recognition of the 3rd 2rd tier action shall be added to “B 1 and 8”. The 3rd 16th tier action shall be recognized.

“As seen in the foregoing”.

"Ero-friendly".

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow