All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is 10,00 won for each of the 110,000 won received by Defendant A from Defendant B and H, which is the consideration for the daily work provided by Defendant B and it has used his own cir own cirter trucks free of charge, but did not provide them for

(2) In full view of the circumstances described in the part on the “determination of the Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion,” the court below’s decision is reasonable to deem that the Defendant provided a self-use truck for a cargo transport for a cost, as described in the judgment of the court below, in consideration of the following: (a) the number plate of the self-use truck was affixed; (b) the number plate of the self-use truck was attached; and (c) the Defendants’ additional statement of the grounds for appeal, contrary to the Defendants’ assertion, were made on the floor, were made within the scope of supplement in case of supplement in case of the grounds for appeal; and (d) the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, which is the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below.

Therefore, the above assertion by the Defendants is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.