logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2020.11.26 2020구합2646
공무원 징계(견책) 처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the reprimand disposition written in the purport of the claim (hereinafter “the reprimand disposition of this case”);

A. The plaintiff is a Grade 6 public official of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office.

B. On November 7, 2018, the Plaintiff was acquitted of the obstruction of performance of official duties, among the charges charged, of imposing a fine of KRW 1 million on the following criminal facts (hereinafter “instant disciplinary cause”) in the Sungwon District Court’s Sung-nam branch branch.

On May 3, 2019, the Suwon District Court was sentenced to a suspended sentence on the grounds of unfair sentencing (2018No7260), and the appeal against it was dismissed on July 12, 2019.

(2019Do6937) (hereinafter referred to as “relevant criminal case,” and “related criminal judgment” on June 13, 2017). On June 22:47, 2017, the Plaintiff, upon receiving a report from C High School located in C High School (hereinafter referred to as “D”) located in B of Gyeonggi-nam Police Station E (hereinafter referred to as “the Plaintiff is a bus engineer, who would not have any verbal assault to customers, and would not drive) and received a request for voluntary operation by consultation with the victim F by the chief of the police station, the police station, and the police station, who was called for by the Plaintiff, among the victims of the bus articles J and a large number of persons, expressed that the Plaintiff “this fechi, a pair of fechi and a pair of fechis,” thereby openly insulting the victim.

C. On August 23, 2019, the Defendant rendered the instant disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff on the ground of the instant disciplinary measure.

Therefore, the plaintiff filed a request for examination with the local appeals review committee of Seoul Special Metropolitan City, but it was dismissed on February 6, 2020.

The purport of the Plaintiff is that the Plaintiff: (a) was the name of perjury, the arrest of abuse of authority, and the direct assault; (b) the name of abuse of official authority and the arrest of G; and (c) the abuse of official authority and obstruction of another’s exercise of authority and obstruction of another’s exercise of authority and obstruction of another’s exercise of authority and obstruction of another’s exercise of authority and obstruction of another’s exercise of rights to transfer prosecution opinions against the Plaintiff

A complaint was filed under the name of each of the crimes.

The accused was involved in the investigation of related criminal cases.

arrow