logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 06. 20. 선고 2017두40198 판결
명의신탁에 있어서 명의도용 사실의 입증 책임은 주장하는 자에게 있음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2016-Nu-68870 ( February 14, 2017)

Case Number of the previous trial

Seocho 2015Seoul Northern2017 (29. 2015.06)

Title

In title trust, there is a person who asserts the liability to prove the identity theft.

Summary

(As with the judgment of the first instance court), there is no sufficient proof of the identity theft of the title trust, and there is a possibility that he knew or impliedly knew of it.

Related statutes

Article 45-2 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

Cases

2017Du40198 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax

Plaintiff

Yang-○

Defendant

○ Head of tax office

Imposition of Judgment

June 20, 2017

Text

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

As the appellant did not state the grounds of appeal in the petition of appeal filed, and did not submit the grounds of appeal within the statutory period, Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, Article 429 of the Civil Procedure Act, and Article 5 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Procedure of Appeal by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow