beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: “2015,13.” “2015,11.13.” in the 4th five parallel of the judgment of the first instance is as follows: “Until January 15, 2015”; “Until January 15, 2015.”; “Until January 15, 2015.” in the 5th parallel of the 5th parallel of the 5th one is as follows; “Until January 15, 2015.” “At January 15, 2016.” “Plaintiff” in the 5th parallel of the 5th one is as “Plaintiff”; “The 5th parallel of the 5th one is as “the Plaintiff,” and “the Plaintiff’s assertion as the grounds for appeal is identical to the grounds for the first instance judgment, except for adding the judgment as set forth in the 2th parallel of the 2nd judgment.”
2. Additional determination
A. The contract term of the Plaintiff’s assertion was until September 23, 2016. On or around December 2015, 2015, the credit card approval number reached 2200,000 items, which are the agreed number of credit card approvals, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed on a new payment method for subsidies for remaining contract, and the instant contract is not terminated when the credit card approval number reaches 220,000 items, which are 220,000 items of the agreed number of approvals.
B. According to the testimony of Gap 2, Eul 2, Eul 3, Eul 2, Eul 2, Eul 3, Eul 2, and Eul 3, and witness E and F of the court of first instance, among the contract of this case, the contract of this case, "the number of terms and conditions of the contract of this case stated "36 months agreed and one year after arrival of the number of terms and conditions", and the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to enter into a credit card use contract on October 2, 2015 with a view to entering into a new condition as the number of approvals of the credit card around December 2015 is anticipated to reach the number of terms and conditions of the contract of this case. The plaintiff can recognize the installation of a new terminal and program at the defendant's place of business on January 15, 2016. The plaintiff asserted that the contract of this case was terminated at the arrival of the number of days of approval of the contract of this case on December 12, 2015.