beta
Text
1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff (Appointed) KRW 15,794,400, KRW 3,000, KRW 3,000 and each of the above amounts.
Reasons
1.The following facts of recognition may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5 and all pleadings:
around May 2011, the defendant was employed by the FF corporation located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City E and had a sense of identification to G who is an employee motive.
B. Around 20:10 on May 8, 2012, the Defendant: (a) divided talks with the Plaintiff and G in the F Co., Ltd. parking lot; (b) made the fact that G was not subject to the Defendant’s telephone; (c) made a dispute between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff seeking to restrain it; and (d) made the price of snow from the Plaintiff during the said dispute.
C. Accordingly, the Defendant, at the office of the first floor of the company (16.5cm in knife length), had a upper part of the company (16.5m in knife length), and the Defendant, as a knife knife knife knife knife of the Plaintiff’s chest, knife, knife, knife, knife, etc., knife over 11 times. As a result, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the Plaintiff’s chest, knife, knife, knife, and damage to the knife knife, etc., which
(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.
On October 25, 2012, the Defendant was prosecuted for committing the crime of murder at this court. On October 25, 2012, this court found the Defendant guilty of attempted murder and sentenced the Defendant to six years of imprisonment.
(Seoul High Court Decision 2012No. 507). The Defendant appealed against the judgment of the first instance court. On January 25, 2013, the appellate court accepted the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing and sentenced the Defendant to five years of imprisonment (Seoul High Court Decision 2012No3740), and around that time, the said judgment of the appellate court became final and conclusive.
E. Appointed C is the father of the Plaintiff, and the Appointor D is the Plaintiff’s mother.
2. Determination
A. According to the above facts, the Defendant committed an attempted murder and thereby committed a tort causing injury to the Plaintiff. Therefore, the Defendant committed such an attempted murder.