1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On January 14, 191, Plaintiff A joined the Defendant and worked as the customer center of the customer center of the customer center of the Defendant from August 1, 2012 to July 1, 2014, and was issued as Honam Marketing on July 16, 2014. Plaintiff B entered the Defendant on June 11, 1985 and was issued as the marketing team on July 1, 201 to April 1, 201. Plaintiff C was issued as the head of the customer center of the Defendant Military Customer Center and was on July 1, 2014. Plaintiff C was on marketing to the Defendant on August 6, 1996, and was on duty as the head of the branch office of the Defendant Namnam Branch from July 1, 201 to May 1, 2014.

B. On September 4, 2014, the Defendant held a personnel committee for disciplinary action against the Plaintiffs on the grounds of “unfair receipt of subsidies for non-regular workers” with respect to Plaintiff A and B, and with respect to Plaintiff C, through the Defendant’s electronic settlement system, the grounds for disciplinary action and disciplinary dismissal against the Plaintiffs pursuant to Article 20(1) of the Rules of Employment and Article 30 of the Personnel Service Regulations (hereinafter “each of the instant dismissal dispositions,” including disciplinary dismissal against the Plaintiffs, were referred to as “each of the instant dismissal dispositions,” and each of the instant dismissal dispositions against the Plaintiffs was referred to as “the instant dismissal dispositions,” and on September 12, 2014, the Defendant sent the date of disciplinary action and disciplinary dismissal against the Plaintiffs through the Defendant’s electronic settlement system.

C. On October 2, 2014, when the plaintiffs filed a petition for reexamination, the defendant held a review personnel committee to decide on disciplinary dismissal, and notified the plaintiffs that the reexamination was dismissed on October 13, 2014.

The defendant's regulations and guidelines concerning the dismissal of this case are as shown in the attached Form.

[Reasons for Recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap 1, 15, Eul 1, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30 (including a number of branches; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs asserted that each of the dismissal dispositions of this case is null and void for the following reasons.