Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 4.5 million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall provide game products with contents different from those of the rating for distribution or use, or conduct exchange business of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the same time, and at the same place as paragraphs 1., 2.2 and 3., even though he knows that B used a game machine that was not classified by the lower, illegally exchanged and engaged in speculative activities, aided and abetting B to continue to lease the place.

1. On September 12, 2012, the crime Category B of the Game Industry Promotion Act in violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry around September 12, 2012 established the “D party room” for the “D party room” of the operation of B in B, which is located in B, on September 12, 2012, four game for the “Samaster”, which is an ungraded speculative gaming instrument, and two game for the “Samaster” game for the “samaster”, which is an ungraded speculative gaming instrument, provided for customers to use the above party room, and exchanged the game score obtained by them as KRW 10,00 per 50.

As a result, B provided game products that have not been classified for use, and operated a business exchange of tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

2. After committing a crime in violation of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry on September 23, 2012, B controlled the above facts and was confiscated a game machine, and again, around September 23, 2012, in the aforementioned “D Party Funeral” method, the said method provided four game apparatuses for the use of customers and exchanged them to customers.

As a result, B provided game products that have not been classified for use, and operated a business exchange of tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

3. The crime B, in violation of the Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, committed the speculative act by using the speculative gaming devices as above at the same time and at the same place as the above paragraphs 1. and 2.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol as to B 1.