logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.10.11 2013고단5227
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On October 30, 1997, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for larceny at the Seoul Southern District Court on October 30, 1997; on March 21, 2003, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced to imprisonment of eight years for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court on November 19, 2003; imprisonment of one year and six months for larceny at the Seoul Southern District Court on June 29, 2005; imprisonment of one year and six months for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) at the Seoul Southern District Court on October 11, 2006; and terminated the execution of the final prison on June 1, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On July 16, 2013, around 06:00, the Defendant carried at the entrance of the Dental Health Center in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the victim E, who was displayed at the entrance of the Dental Health Center, and carried one string of the unclaimed market price of the victim E, and carried one string of sugar at the market price.

2. On August 7, 2013: (a) around 23:20, the Defendant opened a string door to the Helel operated by the victim G in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, and intruded into the inside room, and removed from the mobile phone the net gold-shaped food in the shape of pigs that connects the 150,000 won of the market value of the victim G, which was located on his/her customer’s top, to the handphone.

3. On August 13, 2013, at around 06:03, the Defendant opened and intruded a gate that was not set up in the telecom as described in paragraph (3) and carried out one cell phone of the market price equivalent to KRW 170,000 at the market price of the victim G in the new sponse and one cell phone equivalent to KRW 280,000 at the market price owned by the same victim who was on the front sponse.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolens the victims' articles at least three times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A written statement of G and E;

1. Investigation report (to listen to details of telephone communications with victims);

1. Records of seizure, list of seizure, list of seized articles and guns;

1. A previous conviction in judgment:

arrow