The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (a fine of three million won and 16 hours in case of sex crime prevention programs) declared by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The instant crime was committed from June 13, 2013 to the same year by the Defendant.

8. 24. As a result, a short period of time has been taken by an unspecified number of women over 107 times, with a short period of time, the number of times of crime is high and shorter.

However, the Defendant is the first offender, and the crime of this case is not taken by the Defendant to photograph all the rear habits of the victims, and the nature of the crime is relatively weak.

Social attention is clear, such as the defendant's deep reflects on the crime of this case and has been employed as an employee in the apartment management office.

In full view of equity in the punishment of similar cases and all other conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below cannot be deemed unfair because it is too uneasible.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.