beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From November 1, 2004 to March 31, 201, the Defendant is a person who was engaged in overall control over cash, profit and loss management, monetary management, etc. in a restaurant and store with employees of a customer-only D secondary workplace in the above case under a pay contract.
1. Around March 12, 2011, the Defendant, who used the Defendant’s personal account, received KRW 967,860 from the Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s name name bank E account and used it for personal purposes, such as online gambling, etc., while the Defendant received KRW 967,860 from the Defendant’s name Pream to the Defendant’s name.
Ultimately, the Defendant embezzled KRW 967,860 of the above meal cost, which is the victim’s possession, for business purposes.
In addition, the Defendant embezzled KRW 64,381,230 in total on 56 occasions from November 10, 2009 to March 12, 201, as shown in the attached Table 1 list of crimes.
2. Around January 14, 2010, the Defendant, using cash collection method, was employed for personal purposes, such as online gambling, etc. at the place of business of the above D division, which is located in the petition F at the Cheongju-si Office, and the meal cost of KRW 1,50,000,000, which was provided to the victim (ju) B, the partner, from the reputation of the said state, was collected in cash and kept for the victim. Around that time, the Defendant did not deposit it into the victim’s account, but used it for personal purposes, such as online gambling.
Ultimately, the Defendant embezzled KRW 1,500,000 of the above meal cost, which is the victim’s possession, for business purposes.
In addition, the Defendant embezzled total of KRW 32,095,570 on 28 occasions from January 14, 2010 to March 2011, as shown in the second list of crimes in the attached Table 2.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement of the police statement related to G;
1. Complaint;
1. Each letter;
1. Details of deposits in bankbooks;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on deposit transactions;
1. Articles 356 and 355 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts