beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-53905 ( December 20, 2017)
Title
(Resceptic Conduct)
Summary
(2) The disposition of this case on the premise that there is no procedural error in the selection and extension of the scope of investigation, prior notification procedure, notification of tax investigation result, and notification of tax investigation result, is legitimate.
Related statutes
Article 81-7 of the Framework Act on National Taxes
Cases
Supreme Court Decision 2018Du32392
Plaintiff and appellant
Kim*
Defendant, Appellant
The director of the tax office of Luxembourg
The second instance decision
Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-53905 ( December 20, 2017)
Imposition of Judgment
2018.04.26
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the appellant's ground of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Trial Procedure, and it is therefore dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.