The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is too unreasonable in light of the circumstances such as the fact that the defendant is against himself, is in an economically difficult situation, and is trying to recover from damage.

Considering the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, and the circumstances in which the taxi driven by the Defendant is admitted to the Federation of Passenger Transport Business Associations, even if considering the degree of injury of the victims caused by the instant case, the Defendant’s negligence and high possibility of criticism in the instant case, which the Defendant, as a taxi engineer, committed a serious violation of the new subparagraph, and the Defendant’s driver, was at fault of the Defendant, and did not pay the victims a medical fee and a part of the agreement, and the Defendant did not pay the victims. 8 months of the Defendant’s imprisonment without prison labor, which was sentenced by the lower court, are the lowest punishment according to the sentencing criteria, and other various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, are considered, the sentence imposed by the lower court is appropriate and inappropriate.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.