A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. From around 18:50 on May 23, 2013 to 19:30 on the same day, the Defendant was refused to request the victim D to reach an agreement with his/her friendship that he/she was suffering from obstruction of business with the victim’s fluence store operated by Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, and obstructed the victim’s bar business by force by getting the victim’s 7-8 customers who were in the said restaurant out of the above restaurant to leave the flusium.

2. At around 19:45 on May 23, 2013, the Defendant engaged in obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) committed an act that seems to be at the face of H on his/her hand, she committed an assault with the police officer, who was called upon having received a report on the disturbance at the E folklore store as above; and (b) Hashed the police officer at the G District Station at the Kimhae-gu Police Station G District G District, Kim Jung-gu, the police officer called Kimhae-gu, who was called upon upon having received a report on the disturbance; and (c) Had the police officer, she expressed that he/she would be at the face of H on his/her hand, with his/her desire to read “the math of spath, the math of spath, and this spath,” and she committed an assault with his/her finger eye as a h’s eye.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of public duties by police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D and H

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The Defendant repeatedly committed the instant crime, which had the record of punishment for the same kind of crime for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, and caused the instant crime.