The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, although the prosecutor submitted the gist of the grounds for appeal, although the defendant was sufficiently able to threaten the victim by throwing a dangerous glass bottle on the floor and destroying it, taking the victim's arms out of the office, etc., the court below accepted only the defendant's assertion and acquitted the defendant, which affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts.

2. Determination

A. In the trial of the court, the ex officio determination prosecutor applied for amendments to a bill of amendment to the effect that “the glass bottle, which is a dangerous object on the table, was laid on the floor of the table, broken down the victim’s body, and threatened the victim as if he would inflict any harm on the victim’s body.” “The ex officio determination prosecutor applied for amendments to a bill of amendment to the bill of amendment to the effect that “The court approved the amendment to the bill of amendment to the effect that “the victim would inflict any harm on the victim’s body because the glass bottle, which is a dangerous object on the table, was laid on the floor, was broken up on the floor, broken up the victim, and dried up the victim’s body, and drawn up the victim’s arms outside the above office.

Although there are such reasons for ex officio reversal, the prosecutor's assertion of misunderstanding of facts is still subject to the judgment of the court, which will be examined below.

B. Around 15:00 on February 3, 201, the Defendant: (a) was working as a professor of the D Department of C University; (b) at the D Department of C University located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu; (c) did not reflect his opinion on the victim F, who visited to take over and take over the teaching profession for the teaching profession (the age 22); (d) made the victim’s teaching profession into the front bridge; and (e) made it impossible for the Defendant to recognize the width as teaching bridge; and (e) made the victim’s body by putting the glass disease, which is a dangerous object on the table, on the floor, putting the victim’s arms, putting the victim’s arms out of the said office, and putting the victim into the lower office, thereby threatening the victim’s body.

(c).