1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows. Among the judgment of the court of first instance, the following judgments are added to the new arguments of the plaintiff and the defendant at the trial of the court of first instance: ① "19,841,270 won and 20,000 won" among the judgment of the court of first instance; ② "9, 18, 209, 21" among the judgment of the court of second instance shall be deemed "19,841,270 won and 20,000 won; ② "2. 18, 209, 21" shall be deemed " July 27, 2009; ③ "3. 13, 14, 3. 12, 3. 11, 3. 4, 2. 1 through 8, 222-1, 29-2, 6. 7, 30, 4. 7, 5. 8, 5. 7, and 5. 8. 7

(5) Parts 8, 2, 3, and 4 are as follows: ① “The Plaintiff has operated a relatively safe financial asset on a relatively safe product, such as a fixed deposit, at the time of subscribing to a future set fund, and there was little experience in investing in the product that is likely to cause principal loss, such as stocks, as well as the fund,” and ② Parts 8, 2, 3, and 4 are as follows:

(7) Of the table of Chapter 8, the column for entry in paragraph (1) is 19,841,270 from the "20,00,00" to the "19,841,270" to the "total amount of entry (as of May 31, 2007)" to the "169,832,453" to the "13" to the "130,241,183 to the "16,83" to the "169,832,453" to the "1,44, 23, 26, 28, 28 evidence No. 1, and the overall purport of testimony and arguments of the witness of the court of first instance" to the "3, 4-2, Gap, 23, 28, 47, 56 and evidence No. 266-1 through 9, 15, 13, 15-15, 1-2, 1-3 and 1-1-1 of the witness evidence No.