A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

No person shall interfere with the rescue, transfer, first aid, or medical treatment of an emergency patient by emergency medical personnel by means of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, force, or other means.

Nevertheless, on October 17, 2019, at the C Hospital emergency room located in Ansan-si B around 07:40, the defendant asserted that he/she would return home without any specific reason while undergoing an inspection at the 119 first-way emergency vehicle, and that he/she would return home without any specific reason, and that he/she would refrain from reporting the new outbreak of another patient, and that he/she would stop him/her, "the doctor in charge and the driver in charge", and the victim D (37 years old) who is the defendant's doctor in charge of him/her again refrains from the defendant, and "the driver in charge and the driver in charge of him/her", the victim D (37 years old) who is the defendant's doctor in charge of him/her again refrains the defendant, thereby putting the part of the victim's right chest part of the victim's name into the main machine of the defendant, and put him/her into the victim's machine, and "the bom kk kk kk kkk."

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim who is an emergency medical personnel, and threatened the victim with the harm to the body of the victim, thereby hindering emergency medical services.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. On-site photographs and CCTV images closure photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 60(2)1 and Article 12 of the Act on the pertinent criminal facts and the Emergency Medical Services for the Punishment of Specific Crimes, and Article 60(2)1 and Article 12 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Violence in Support of the Suwon District Court, the Defendant, on February 14, 2019, was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for special assault, and two years of suspended sentence, and the judgment became final and conclusive, and again committed the instant crime even during the suspended sentence period, despite the fact that the instant crime was committed during the suspended sentence period. Prior to the instant case, even prior to the occurrence of the crime of interference with business, the Defendant appears to have violent inclinations in light of the Defendant’s violent history, and even