The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) was a person using the clinic “www.dae” (www) after the Internet portal; and (c) was not known around October 1, 2015 at a place in which around 22:30 cannot be known, the Defendant: (a) was appointed an attorney-at-law on the bulletin board of the Internet portal site following the Internet portal site: (a) “The Family Council of U.S. and Ansan-si; (b) the Plaintiff was appointed as a litigation agent of the merchant of the lawsuit claiming damages against Gyeonggi-do; and (c) was moving back to the comments of the F News news news news article “A e-at-law was removed; and (d) the e-mail, which was washing out the image of the video.”

D. L. Sp. Sp. Sp. Sp.

퉤퉤” 라는 글을 게시하여 공연히 피해자 E을 모욕하였다.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and may be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.

However, according to the statement of withdrawal of complaint received from this court on March 3, 2016, which was after the prosecution of this case, the victim's withdrawal of complaint against the defendant is recognized, so the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.