1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne respectively by each party.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the parties 1) Plaintiff A and Defendant C, who was enrolled in the graduate school of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study of the study

B. On Aug. 30, 2012, Plaintiff A drafted Plaintiff A’s written statement that “Plaintiff A entered into a sexual intercourse with Defendant C on two occasions on Mar. 6, 2012, and on March 12, 2013, and then insulting and threatened Defendant C. Plaintiff A is against the above mistake, and the Plaintiff’s statement that “I will immediately go to the military unit without supporting it in the instant internship process without any further suffering from pain with C.”

However, unlike that written in the above letter, the plaintiff A supported the reart process after completing the internship course.

C. On December 21, 2012, Defendant C filed a complaint with Defendant C and the non-prosecution disposition on non-prosecution disposition, and filed a complaint with the Gwangju Northern Police Station on the charge of rape, and the Gwangju Northern District Prosecutors’ Office rendered a decision that it is difficult to recognize the above Defendant’s non-suspecting charges while rendering a disposition on July 17, 2014 without suspicion (Evidence of Evidence).

(No. 18277) d.

The plaintiffs filed a complaint against the Defendants and non-prosecution disposition 1) around the beginning of 2013, the plaintiffs filed a complaint against the Defendants on charges of attempted threat, intimidation, and insult with Defendant C, intimidation against Defendant D, violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint coercion), defamation charges, intimidation against Defendant E, and violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint coercion). The Gwangju District Prosecutors' Office does not have suspicion of all of the charges on May 14, 2013 (defluence of evidence).