logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.02.17 2015가단105565
임금
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 1,266,831 to Plaintiff A, as well as KRW 5% per annum from February 16, 2013 to March 10, 2015; and (b)

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant entrusted the management and operation of the Dong Hospital in Seoul Special Metropolitan City pursuant to Articles 10 through 13 of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Ordinance on the Establishment and Operation of the Dong Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”). At the Defendant Hospital, the Plaintiffs worked for each major (referring to the Plaintiff from around 2012 to February 28, 2013; Plaintiff B, from May 1, 2012 to February 28, 2013; and Plaintiff B, from May 28, 2013 to February 28, 2013).

B. The major of the Defendant hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s medical residents shall be qualified as a medical specialist after completing the training of one of the specialized subjects during a period of four years (in the case of the family department, the period of service of the field without an internship is three years) after completing the training of one of the specialized subjects during the period of four years, as prescribed by the Medical Service Act, etc.

C. The medical residents of the Defendant Hospital worked in the relevant department in accordance with the above training schedule during the regular work hours, and additionally worked on duty in accordance with the duty schedule for each department. D.

The Defendant Hospital paid the Plaintiffs KRW 2,303,080 each monthly base pay during the training period.

(However, the plaintiff A was paid 40,000 won for family allowances.

On the other hand, the Defendant hospital paid the fee on duty under the pretext of preserving the additional work on duty, and the amount is KRW 45,000 for the day duty, KRW 50,000 for the day duty, and KRW 90,000 for the day duty on duty.

F. Of the relevant statutes and the provisions of the Defendant Hospital, the parts related to the instant case are as listed in the relevant statutes.

[Reasons for Recognition] A. 16 Evidence, B. 1,2.

arrow