Of the criminal facts of the defendant, 1 and 2 No. 1 to 6 each year of the crime sight table 1 and 2 of the crime sight table 2.

Punishment of the crime

On July 15, 2011, the Defendant, at the Seoul Central District Court, was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months of imprisonment due to fraud, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 23, 201.

1. On September 23, 2009, the Defendant forged a private document and the uttering of the above investigation document using a computer at the Defendant’s house located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, stating that “FAPT 101 Dong 905, located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul E,” “24 square meters” in the seller column, “Seoul Seongbuk-gu G, H, A, and buyer column” in the seller column, stating “L” in Seoul Seongbuk-gu, J, K, the head of the association column as “L” and “M” in the construction column, and affixing a seal of L seal prepared in advance to the name of the above L.

As such, the Defendant forged a contract for the lease of a zone in the name of L, a private document related to rights and obligations, and traded the FAPT 101 Dong 905, located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, with the intent of exercising the right, and on the same day, used the forged contract for the lease of the zone in the name of L, as if it was duly formed, and subsequently forged and exercised six copies of the contract for the lease of the association, which is a private document related to the rights and obligations of L in the name of L in the name of the president of the association, from September 20, 2012, as shown in attached Table 1.

2. Around February 16, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “M sets up a redevelopment apartment in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seoul, with its own ownership in the redevelopment area, the Defendant has a leased apartment-band-band-band-band-band-band-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand

However, in fact, the defendant did not own the right to sell a rental apartment because he did not own the land shares in the redevelopment area, and even if he received money from the victim N, he used it as his debt repayment and cost of living.