A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around 08:20 on December 5, 2016, 08:3 08:20, Da Apartment Park C apartment 209, and the police officer of the D police box called up after having received a report of domestic violence 112, tried to remove the Defendant, who was sent to the said police officer, and attempted to take the scambling of the scambling team at the ward at the above E, and was sent to the said police officer, who was called up with the above E, was prevented from taking the scambling, and scambling the above scambling, and then brought the above F to the said police officer, who was sent out with the above scambling.

‘I have served as drinking'. ‘I have served as drinking.'

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. Application of each police statement protocol (list 5, 9) to F and G Act and subordinate statute;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the punishment of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (the extent of confession, contingency crimes in the state of main action, and assault is very serious;

As such, the police officer's search for the above police officer's death is not visible.

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order