A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 27, 2016, at around 02:10, the Defendant: (a) without any justifiable reason in front of the exit of 102, the new police officer No. 102, as the bankruptcy of Gangnam-gu; (b) sold knee knee knee knee kne knee kne knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee; and (c) the Defendant obstructed the police officer of the same police box, who was taking protective measures against other knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record;

1. Witness F;

1. Each police statement made with respect to E and D;

1. Reporting on occurrence of a disaster (Obstruction of performance of official duties);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [the scope of recommended punishment] The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the same Act / [the scope of recommended punishment] are the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant that the defendant committed assault against the police without any other reasons, for six months to four years [the decision of sentence], and for recidivism during the period of suspension of execution, the basic area of first type (Interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of duties) (from six months to one year and four months):

However, the degree of assault against the police is very serious;

The sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, career, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined within the scope of the sentencing guidelines, taking into account all the circumstances that are considered the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, such as the fact that it is difficult to see the defendant's mistake, the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake, the first step is deemed to have arisen from the misunderstanding of the defendant, the fact that there is no criminal record of