A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On February 21, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on February 21, 2012, and completed the execution of the said sentence on October 26, 2013.

1. On April 8, 2015, the Defendant, from around 12:29 to around 12:55 on April 8, 2015, 2015, was at the house of the victim D located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and then destroyed the window on the side of the kitchen and intruded into the house into the house of the victim D, and thereby thefting it by putting about 200,000 won in cash located in the storm of the storm bank, and 18 kbs in the market price, including 1,00 won in total, KRW 9,70,000,000,000,000 won in precious metals and KRW 3 million in market price.

2. 2015. 4. 9.자 주거침입 및 절도 피고인은 2015. 4. 9. 11:35경부터 11:44경 사이, 서울 서대문구 E에 있는 피해자 F의 집에 이르러, 시정되지 않은 현관문을 열고 집 안으로 침입하여 안방에 있는 보석장에 들어 있던 시가 불상의 롤렉스 시계 1점, 1캐럿 3부 다이아몬드 반지 1점, 18k 금목걸이 1점, 루비 반지 1점, 백금 팔찌 1점 등을 가지고 가 이를 절취하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A written statement of F and D;

1. Investigative reports (related to a suspected vehicle), car screening meetings, suspected vehicles and suspects, photographs of traffic offenses, field identification reports, field photographs, field photographs, site photographs, investigation reports (report on addition of damaged articles), investigation reports (investigation into data on the video recording ofCCTV), emotional records, investigation reports (personal records, such as the suspect's pocket plates and news), driver's photographs, physical paintings and permanent photographs, investigation reports (hereinafter referred to as the "victim's DNA hearing reports");

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports, personal identification and confinement status of the defendant and his defense counsel denies that the defendant had not stolen by intrusion upon his/her residence, but the vehicle used for committing a crime recognized by each evidence of the above judgment, the vehicle discovered at the victim's house, the garment of the offender taken from CCTV, and the defendant's clothes.