Text
1. Defendant A’s imprisonment for eight months, Defendant B’s fine of six thousand won, and Defendant C’s imprisonment for six months, respectively.
2...
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on November 7, 2014 to two years of imprisonment with prison labor due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Composition and Activities of Organizations, etc.) in the Busan District Court’s Vice Branch on November 7, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 15th of the same month, and is currently
[Criminal facts]
1. The Defendants are to sell used cars at low prices, which are false goods called “retailed” to customers who believe the horses of the business members easily.
After inducing the first contract, the first contract is planned to demand additional expenses for the said vehicle, give up the first contract by means of one-person “tamping” and sell the said vehicle with high profits, or sell the vehicle at a price much higher than the reasonable price. The Defendant C, by posting a false article on the Internet website, induced customers with “fringing”, mediates the sales of the vehicle against the customers who discovered the report, and arranged the sales of the vehicle, and Defendant B and Defendant A are in charge of the sales of the vehicle.
Defendant
C Around July 2016, using “f” “F” in Seo-gu Incheon, Incheon, inducing the victim D to the “F” trading complex. Defendant A and Defendant B, around 11:00 on July 6, 2016, displayed the victim’s “F” in the “F” trading complex, and displayed the victim’s BMW 528D car, and then the victim “the vehicle is located on the advertisement of this vehicle.” On the other hand, the victim made a mid-to-face trading contract with the purchase price of KRW 28,80,000 on the said vehicle and had the victim enter into a loan contract.
Defendant
A and Defendant B, immediately after the preparation of the contract with the victim, state that “this vehicle is a vehicle with a KRW 50 million attached,” and made the victim waive the purchase of the above vehicle.