1. The plaintiffs' primary claims and conjunctive claims are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Details of confinement;

(a) A public announcement, etc. of project approval of an urban development project (hereinafter “related project in this case”): A public announcement of November 17, 201 in Namyang-si, and F2 in the public notification of Namyang-si on May 9, 201: A project implementer under Articles 3 and 4 of the Urban Development Act (urban development project under Article 3 and Article 4 of the Urban Development Act): Defendant Cooperatives 4): Project implementation district in Namyang-si, Seoul-si:

B. Public announcement, etc. of the project for opening the Do Urban Planning Facilities (hereinafter “instant project”): A public announcement on March 20, 2014 of the Namyang-si public notification on March 20, 2014, H, and I2 in the Namyang-si public notification on June 19, 2014: A project implemented pursuant to Articles 86 and 88 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act (hereinafter “National Land Planning Act”) in order to construct roads, which are urban planning facilities required due to the instant related project: Defendant Union 4) each of the land listed in attached Table 1, the Plaintiffs, in the instant project implementation district.

C. Of each land listed in attached Table 1 of the Decision on Expropriation (hereinafter “The Decision on Expropriation”) dated September 22, 2014 by the Defendant Expropriation Committee (hereinafter “the Decision on Expropriation”) as of September 22, 2014, the date of expropriation as of KRW 1,377,160,000 for each land owned by the Plaintiff and KRW 28,216,400 for compensation for losses for agriculture conducted by the Plaintiff and KRW 28,216,400 for each land listed in attached Table 1 “Attachment 2”), among each land listed in attached Table 1 of the “Attachment A” by the Defendant Expropriation Committee on Expropriation of Expropriation of Land A due to the instant project: the purpose of expropriation as of November 6, 2014 for each land owned by the Plaintiff, and KRW 310,47,000 for each land listed in the “Attachment B” and the purport of the entire pleadings as to each of the above land: Party A’s number Nos. 1 through 7 (the grounds for recognition]

2. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. 1) The Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects (hereinafter “Land Compensation Act”)

In order to make a lawful acceptance ruling by the court, the acceptance ruling can be made.