Text
All judgment of the court below shall be reversed.
Each of the crimes against Defendant 1, 5, 2, and 3 as stated in the judgment of the first instance.
Reasons
1. Each sentence of the judgment of the court below against the defendant of the summary of the grounds for appeal (the first judgment: imprisonment of April, 2 years of suspended execution, 6 months of imprisonment and 2 months of imprisonment): fine of 50,000 won: fine of 100,000 won; imprisonment of 6 months and imprisonment of 6 months) is too unreasonable.
2. Prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant ex officio, the first instance court, after completing a separate examination on the grounds for appeal by the defendant, shall be sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for April, suspension of execution for two years and six months, the second instance court to a fine of KRW 500,000,000,000, and the third instance court to a fine of KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000, and the fourth instance court to a fine for six months and six months, respectively, filed an appeal against each of the above judgments, and the court of the first instance to a concurrent trial. The court of the first instance decided to jointly deliberate on all of the above appeals. Since the crimes committed by the defendant prior to the final judgment of the first instance court and the concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act are concurrent crimes under Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act, the judgment of the court below shall be sentenced to a single sentence within the period of punishment aggravated
(In addition, the crime of the judgment of the third court and the crime of the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act are concurrent crimes with the above crime for which judgment has become final and conclusive, and the punishment shall be determined at the same time in accordance with Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act; however, since the third court omitted the sentence, the above judgment of the court below is no longer able to be maintained in this respect as it omitted, since the third court omitted it.).
Criminal facts
(b).