logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2017.10.25 2017가단54435
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the real estate stated in the attached Form.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3.Paragraph 1.

Reasons

1. The facts of recognition [based on recognition] without dispute, the entries in Gap 2, 3, and 6 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings, and the plaintiff and the defendant verify that the lease contract dated April 19, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as "the real estate in this case") was terminated as of February 28, 2017 due to the defendant's failure to execute the contract on November 23, 2010 and the change contract dated November 29, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as "the real estate in this case"), and they confirm that the contract was terminated as of February 28, 2017 due to overdue rent, etc., KRW 4,00,000 until April 19, 2017, KRW 3,000,000 until April 30, 2017, 2017;

5. By October, 100, each payment of KRW 3,000,000 shall be made, and in the event of default, the deposit shall be appropriated for arrears such as rent, etc., and the amount equivalent to the amount of unjust enrichment (rents and management expenses, etc.) shall be paid every month until the order is issued, and in the event of delay of the above payment date, the defendant shall close the business place and deliver the instant real estate to the plaintiff by seven days from the date of closure.

The defendant did not pay the money under the above agreement from time to time, and did not pay monthly rent and management expenses on June 2017.

Accordingly, on July 8, 2017, the Plaintiff sent back a letter of content-certified mail to the Plaintiff, requesting the Plaintiff to clarify the real estate indicated in the attached list.

2. According to the facts acknowledged as above, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff's claim is justified and accepted.

arrow