logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2017.11.02 2017고합77
살인
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for life.

The seized blades (38.5cm in total length, 26cm in length, 3cm in width), one (No. 1).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

In 207, the person against whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") used the Internet network service provided by KT Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "KT") while living in the residential area located in Ansan-si, 2007.

The Defendant, around the same time, based on a news report with the content that “the Internet line supply company does not provide a high speed to customers with a high speed (referring to regulating the speed).” After the call center’s name, which is operated by KT, provides for the authenticity of the above report and provision thereof to employees, and “the computer speed in the city is well known.”

It is not that we judge news.

Although having asked the purport of “”, it does not take any other measure on the part of KT, and it does not properly treat the civil petition.

“I think I think I think.”

On September 2009, the Defendant used the Internet service provided by GIST even after moving into the residence of D located in the Gu of Ansan-si, a member of the Gu of Ansan-si. While the Defendant was provided with the service via the telephone line, the Defendant received a claim for the Internet service charges through the optical cable network from GIST. At the time of the installation of the Internet, the Defendant was informed by the installation engineer in his name and selected the Internet service, the Scar TV service, and the Internet telephone service combined with the Internet service, and then received a claim for more than the charges agreed upon by GIST, and thereafter protested against it.

On June 2013, 2013, the Defendant was moving to the residence of the Hahman, who used the Internet service using the general telephone line. However, even though he did not hear clear answers from KT as to the use of the optical cable network, neighbors, who had been directors adjacent to the Defendant’s residence, are provided with the optical cable network Internet service provided by KT.

arrow