1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. (1) The defendant is a school foundation that has established and operated E University (hereinafter “Defendant University”) before and after the request for the relocation of the office, and the co-defendant C and D are the president and the managing director of the Defendant University.

On March 1, 2008, the Plaintiff is a professor of the Defendant’s college food engineering and professor.

B. The Defendant’s University Food Engineering Division included the Plaintiff, and the 11st professor was in office. Of which, the Plaintiff received funding from the G Group and used the F Building as a teaching room and a graduate school student laboratory, the number of 501 and 503 of the 5th 5th 5th 5th st and 503 of the 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 500 st and the 503th 503th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 50.

Some of the food engineering and professors (four) had laboratories and laboratories in the F building, as shown with the Plaintiff, but the rest professors were assigned the relevant space to the Life Science Museum (which is adjacent to the food research officer, and which is located at a distance of about 100 meters from the above building).

On September 2012, the Defendant University newly established the K graduate school (hereinafter “K graduate school”) according to the agreement to operate a research and degree course on convergence technology in the field of science and technology jointly with J on September 2012, the Defendant University agreed to assign all part of the first floor and the fifth floor to the K graduate school’s research space.

Accordingly, on January 8, 2013, the Defendant’s university sent a public letter to the president of the Life Science University, and requested the Plaintiff to transfer five offices within the F building used by the relevant university by January 31, 2013, including “501 and 503.” The Plaintiff also sent a position to the same effect.

x, however, the plaintiff is against the research institute, such as publishing a number of papers in the qualification of the researcher belonging to the International Research Institute.