1. On December 24, 2014, Defendant Educational Foundation B’s dismissal of the Plaintiff on December 24, 2014 confirms that such dismissal is null and void.

2. The plaintiff's defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. Before and after the request for the relocation of the office, the Defendant’s private teaching institute is the E University (hereinafter “Defendant’s University”).

A) A school foundation which has established and operated, etc., and Defendant C and D are the president and the managing director of the Defendant’s university. On March 1, 2008, the Plaintiff is a person appointed as a professor for life and food engineering and professor of the Defendant’s university. The food engineering department of the Defendant’s university, including the Plaintiff, was in office as 11 professor, and among them, the Plaintiff was used as the office, etc. of the “I Research Institute” under the Defendant’s university’s “I Research Institute” located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seoul.

hereinafter referred to as "F building"

) The number of 501 and 503 of the fifth floor were allocated by the school, and used as a faculty research room and a graduate school student laboratory. Some of the food engineering and professors (four of them) had a laboratory and laboratory in the F building like the Plaintiff, but the rest of the professors are located at a distance of about 100 meters from the above building.

(2) Around September 2012, the Defendant University newly established K graduate schools (hereinafter “K graduate schools”) pursuant to an agreement with J to operate research and degree courses on convergence technology in the field of science and technology, and decided to allocate all the part of the first and fifth floors of the F Building as research space at K graduate schools.

Accordingly, on January 8, 2013, the defendant university sent a public letter to the president of the Life Science University on January 8, 2013 and sent five offices within the F building used by the university, including subparagraphs 501 and 503.

1. By March 31, 200, the Plaintiff requested a “transfer to a life science museum” and the Plaintiff also delivered a position to the same effect.

3. However, the plaintiff's contribution to the research institute, such as publishing a number of thesis as a researcher belonging to the research institute.