logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원통영지원 2015.09.22 2014가단15834
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Of the buildings listed in the separate sheet, each point in the separate sheet No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1;

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On June 5, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) leased a lease deposit of KRW 10 million; (b) monthly rent of KRW 130,00,00 (excluding value-added tax); and (c) from June 24, 2013 to June 23, 2015, a lease deposit of KRW 170,000 square meters in a part office of “A” (hereinafter “instant office”) connected each point in order to the Defendant, among the buildings listed in the attached list as indicated in the attached Table, to the Defendant.

B. From May 2014 to November 201, 2014, the Defendant did not pay to the Plaintiff a total of KRW 9.1 million. On December 4, 2014, the Plaintiff is on the ground that the Plaintiff has not paid a total of at least two-year rent.

The lease contract mentioned in subsection was terminated.

C. Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to order the Plaintiff to pay the pertinent office fees of KRW 9.1 million, unpaid fees of KRW 9.1 million, and to pay the said office fees at the rate of KRW 1,430,000 per month, which is unjust enrichment equivalent to the value-added tax, including the value-added tax, from December 24, 2014 to the order of the said office.

2. Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act applicable to Acts and subordinate statutes;

arrow