Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 800,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 9, 2012, around 22:22, the Defendant: (a) arrived at the seat of 105 G apartment in Scheon-si, G apartment 105, the destination of which is the F taxi operated by the victim E on the front side of Scheon-si, Sacheon-si; (b) and (c) continued to return to the road that had been on the road, and thereby, interfered with the victim’s taxi business for about 30 minutes by force by force, such as bringing the victim’s bath, failing to get off the taxi.

2. The Defendant publicly insultingd the victim E by openly referring to the victim E as “a pair of feass, argument” among police officers and C dispatched upon receipt of a report at the same location at the same time and at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

【Fact of Paragraph 1 at the Time of Sales】

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Report on the occurrence of the case;

1. The output of the NAV map (the fact of paragraph (2) at the time of printing);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. On October 9, 2012, around 22:30 on October 22, 2012, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim C, a police officer, by publicly insultingly speaking, “ponner shall be a police officer with low feat and flexible feat.” to the victim C, who is a police officer, among seven taxi drivers E and Dong police officers within the Icheon-si International District.”

2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act and can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the statement in the letter of withdrawal of complaint submitted on October 23, 2012, the victim can have cancelled the complaint against the defendant after the prosecution. Thus, Article 327 of the Criminal Procedure Act is applicable.