A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 14, 2018, the Defendant reported damage to the taxi according to the C district located in B at Jeju as the taxi driver did not pay the taxi expenses. On the same day at around 01:20 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) was hicker who heard that he would pay the taxi expenses and return home from the police officers belonging to the above B; (b) was hicker’s hicker; (c) was hicking the said D; (d) was tightly hicked; (d) was hicked with drinking; and (d) was hicked on the hicker’s hand; and (d) obstructed the lawful performance of duties concerning the control and maintenance of order of police officers by assaulting the said D by assaulting the said D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for the observation of protection and the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order is that the degree of assault against the public official of this case is not somewhat weak.

However, the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, environment, and circumstances after the crime, have no record of being punished due to interference with the execution of official duties, and the fact that the defendant recognizes and reflects the crime, shall be determined together with all other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, the environment,