Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On December 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a 112 report from the head of the police station located in Ansan-gu, Mayang-si, Mayang-si, Mayang-si, Mayang-si, Mayang-si, the Defendant: (b) received the 112 report to return home to the taxi expenses from the head of the police station affiliated with the C District; and (c) received the recommendation to return home from the head of the C District; (d) “Sari police”, “Sari police”, “Sari-si, Sari-gu, Sari-gu, Sari-gu, Sari-gu, Sari-gu, Sari-gu, and Sari-gu, Sari-gu, Sari-gu, the head of the police station, while taking a bath, 9 times the head of the police station D's finger-do, kn-do, and 4 times the right buck of the Gyeong-do.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties concerning 112 reporting processing affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A E-document;

1. A report on investigation, a report on investigation (a witness’s statement) and a report on investigation (CCTV, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTV images extracted;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is inferior in light of the background and content of the crime, the sentencing of the Defendant is likely to be seriously against the Defendant, the primary offender, and various sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, sex, occupation, and property status, should be taken into account.