logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.08.27 2014고정708
공전자기록등불실기재등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant was awarded a proposal to the effect that he would be allowed to enter Korea by making a disguised marriage with Vietnam from ‘B, women, and C'(B, C'D) and would be allowed to enter Korea, and he would accept the proposal and invite E to make it false.

1. On January 11, 2010, the Defendant entered false records, such as public electronic records, etc., and the same events, submitted a marriage report prepared as if he/she had no intention to marry with E at the public service center of the member's Gu office located in Ansan-si, Seoul-si, and submitted it to the public official in charge of public administration who is aware of the fact that he/she is married, and had the public official in charge enter the false facts in the public electronic records information system, and exercised it immediately by having the public official in charge store and operate it in the family registration information system.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Immigration Control Act ( False Invitation) reported the marriage falsely as seen in the above paragraph (1) and, even though he well-known that the purpose of entry into the Republic of Korea is not the purpose of employment, the purpose of entry into the Republic of Korea is not the purpose of marriage with himself, he was willing to enter the place of marriage in the country

Around February 11, 2010, the Defendant issued a false marriage certificate, family relation certificate, etc. to E by international mail via the ‘F-2' ‘F-2' ‘F-2'. On February 11, 2010, the Defendant made a false application for a marriage visa (F-2) with a false entry visa application document stating the purpose of entry into the Embassy of the Republic of Korea Embassy in the Republic of Korea.

Accordingly, the defendant falsely invited E for the purpose of marriage stay.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 228(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of entry of false public electronic records), Articles 229 and 228(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of exercise of false public electronic records) of the choice of punishment for criminal facts, and the Gu.

arrow