A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding 2,00,000 won.

However, the above imprisonment for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 28, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for a violation of official duties in the Seoul Eastern District Court, which became final and conclusive on October 11, 2017, and is currently in the grace period.

1. On October 10, 2017, at around 16:40, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, on the front of D main points in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul. On the ground that the Defendant’s access to a nearby singing practice place was restricted and became commercialized, the Defendant called to the 112 comprehensive situation room of the Seoul Regional Police Agency, and requested the police to send the police without specifying the reported details. Accordingly, the Defendant called to the scene and tried to confirm the Defendant’s report by sending it to the site by the EslopingF, etc. of the Seoul Western Police Station, which was ordered by the order, and continued drinking.

Accordingly, the F, based on the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, had PDA (police inquiry mobile phones) in the patrol car to notify the Defendant of his act of disturbance of drinking, and the Defendant used the part on the right side of the F's back water and assaulted the breast at once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the notification and 112 notification by police officers.

2. The Defendant injured the Defendant by negligence was taking 2 maths of pet dogs at the time and place indicated in paragraph 1, and was responsible for them.

Since a pet dog is in danger of watering a person, a person accompanied by a pet dog has a duty of care to keep the pet dog from being able to properly regulate its length, and prevent the pet dog from being kept out of others.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and assault F as set forth in paragraph 1, and committed an assault to F, and caused one math of the above pet dog by negligence, and caused the Defendant to commit an assault to the Defendant, thereby making it difficult to identify the number of days of treatment to the victim by asking once the victim G ( South, the age of 30) who is a police official who has committed an assault to the Defendant.