(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.07.03 2014고정450

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.07.03 2014고정450

모욕

Text

The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 10, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one month due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 18, 2014.

Around 21:50 on December 7, 2013, when the Defendant was arrested and detained in a flagrant act in Jeju Police Station D District District at Jeju Police Station at Jeju Island at Jeju, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim E (the victim 35 years old), a police officer belonging to the said district police station, for the purpose of having been arrested and detained on the charge of interference with business, on the ground that the Defendant demanded the victim E (the victim 35 years old), who was a police officer belonging to the said district police station, to unsat down the lock, but did not unsat down the lock, the Defendant took the victim’s view that “this spice, spons, spons, spons, spons, spons, and sponsed at the same bit of bitch,” while the victim’s obstruction of business was

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A criminal investigation report (D District CCTV image verification), investigation report (G main oral statement);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, notifications of dispositions, and reports on the results of confirmation;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

1. Handling concurrent crimes and exemption from punishment: The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act [the crime committed simultaneously with the same temporary border, which was the cause of the arrest in the act of interference with business, which was detained, and the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. in the course of admission after the arrest in the act of interference with business, which was the cause of the arrest in the act of committing an act of interference with business, and the judgment ordering two years of suspension of execution and community service 80

참조조문

유사 판례

-청주지방법원 2020.08.27 2020고단768

-광주지방법원 순천지원 2020.01.30 2019고단2631

-서울북부지방법원 2020.03.27 2020고합32

-제주지방법원 2015.04.30 2015고단350

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2013.01.18 2012고정1362