A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the Category B N motor vehicle.

On December 13, 2016, the Defendant driven the foregoing vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 00:50% in blood, and continued to drive the vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.192% in the direction of the dial distance in front of C at an influent city, with the flow of the adjacent road into the surface of the original private distance from the surface of the drupture, at the Dhump of the river.

In this case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to operate the steering and brakes accurately by reducing the speed and properly manipulating the steering and brakes while keeping the right and the right and the right of the driver of the motor vehicle in the vicinity of the three-distance intersection.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not see the front door of the phone while driving the phone, and caused the victim I (54 years old), who was a passenger (42 years old), who was a passenger (54 years old) who was a passenger (54 years old) who was a passenger (54 years old) who was a passenger (54 years old) who tried to get a passenger to board the H taxi after having stopped on the front door of the vehicle of the Defendant, with the driver’s vehicle of the victim (42 years old), by driving the vehicle of the victim (42 years old).

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim E, such as brain-dead, etc. without any wound in the two fields where approximately two weeks of treatment is open, on the part of the victim G for about two weeks of treatment, and on the part of the pipe, sprinke, sprinke, tension, etc. of the part where the sprinke is needed to be treated for about two weeks of treatment, on the part of the victim J (56 years of age) who boarded the above H cab and K (52 years of age), on the part of the victim J (56 years of age) who boarded the above H cab, and on the part of the victim I (54 years of age), proposed that approximately two weeks of treatment should be provided to the victim I for about two weeks of treatment.