logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.12.12 2013고단6494
사기
Text

Defendant

I shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] Defendant I was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in the year and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Eastern District Court on June 27, 2012

7.5.A judgment becomes final and conclusive and is still under suspension of execution;

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant

A is the head of the K team, and the defendant I is the head of the above company.

On January 2013, the Defendants recruited golf travel visitors in China, but when the above travel expenses were insufficient, the Defendants conspired to acquire economic benefits by deceiving the victims through L which is the partner of the victim J and allowing the victims to pay the above expenses on behalf of them.

Defendant

A according to the above public offering relationship, a telephone called to the victim's office in Gwangju City according to the above public offering relationship, and via the above L, "the victim from January 20, 2013" to the victim.

1. By the end of 24.2, up to 4.5 days of travel, a total of 46.8 million won per person was sold as a travel plan for four-day Chinese travel.

In the new side of the party, first of all, the expenses for golf travel in China will be paid on behalf of the party and the above travel expenses will be repaid at the early time.

“The meaning was “...”

However, at the time of fact, Defendant A had been in a bad credit condition, and the travel expenses that he had received from the travels that he had recruited were not enough enough to use as the travel expenses and office operation expenses of the travels prior to the above travels. Defendant I also used the money that he received from the above travels as its office operation expenses in the situation where financial standing is not good due to bad credit standing. Thus, the Defendants did not have the intent or ability to pay the above travel expenses to the victim, even if the said travels were to be paid by the victim, and even if the said travels were to be carried out, they did not have the intent or ability to pay the travel expenses that he had paid to him.

arrow