A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 22, 2014, the Defendant damaged the property damage at the front of Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, on the street, the Defendant: (a) took a wrong hearing about the scheduled destination of the victim D, who is a driver of a taxi boarding by the Defendant; (b) took a look at the right side of the E-si, which is the victim’s possession, by plucking, digging up, and destroying the 102,773 won at the repair cost of the said taxi.

2. 공무집행방해 피고인은 2014. 10. 22. 10:50경 위 장소에서, 폭력 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 서울 서초경찰서 F지구대 소속 경찰관인 G, H가 사건 경위를 파악하기 위해 사건 내용을 물어보자, 택시기사에게 맞은 것은 자신인데 경찰관들이 자신만을 범죄자 취급한다는 이유로 화가 나, “야, 이 씨발놈아. 꺼져라. 왜 나한테 그러느냐. 좆까고 있네. 씨발쌔끼들, 니들이 경찰이냐. 더러운 놈들. 미친놈들. 지랄하고 있네. 개자식들아. 좆만아.”라고 욕설을 하며 주먹으로 위 G의 어깨와 몸 부위를 3~4회 가량 때리고, 계속하여 위 H의 왼쪽 팔을 잡아 비틀고 주먹으로 가슴 부위를 2~3회 때리는 등 폭행을 가하여 112 신고업무 처리에 관한 경찰관의 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. D Police suspect interrogation protocol;

1. Statement of the police statement of I, H and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph by cutting off on-site CCTVs;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Mutual Crimes of Obstruction of Official Duties against Police Officers);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is the same as the obstruction of the performance of official duties (the scope of recommendations).