The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal is as follows: (a) although the victim was not injured to the extent of the crime of injury, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case; and (b) there is an error of law by misunderstanding the facts or misunderstanding the legal principles

Although the Defendant is disputing the causal relationship between the victim's low-time disability and the assault of this case, this part is not included in the facts charged, so it is not judged separately.

2. The injury diagnosis report submitted by the victim of the crime of injury generally grasps the cause of the injury based on the victim's statement, stating the part, degree, etc. of the injury observed and judged by using medical expertise, and it is insufficient to directly prove the fact that the injury as mentioned above was caused by the criminal act of the defendant. However, in cases where the date and time of the diagnosis of the injury are close to the time and the time of the issuance of the injury diagnosis report, there are no special circumstances to doubt the credibility of the injury, and where the part and degree of the injury as mentioned are consistent with the cause and circumstance of the injury alleged by the victim, unless there are special circumstances such as where the victim was abused by the third party or where it was discovered that the victim prepared a false diagnosis report from the third party, etc., the injury diagnosis report can not be rejected without permission of its probative value as well as the statement of the victim, as well as evidence of the fact of the injury of the defendant, and without reasonable grounds (see Supreme Court Decision 2007Do1367, May 10, 2007).

It is extremely minor that there is no violence, accompanied by violence.