(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.12.23 2014고정761

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.12.23 2014고정761

상해

Text

The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

C and Defendant A have jointly established and operated (State)D sirens companies.

On February 13, 2014, around 15:11, the Defendant injured the victim C’s face at the F coffee shop located in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-si by drinking three times as a drink, and was in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate (C);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserted that even though there was contact between the defendant and the victim, there was no fact that the defendant was clicking or drinking prices of the victim as stated in the facts charged, and since the defendant first purchased the price, it constitutes a legitimate act as a passive resistance.

In light of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant was at the time of her face with the victim, as shown in the facts charged in this case.

In particular, C, the victim, clearly states the facts of damage to comply with the facts charged in this court, and there is a difference in the collection of the statement or statement prepared at the time of the police investigation. However, it is relatively consistent with the background and order of the defendant's face to drinking the buck and face from the defendant (where the defendant was her face from the defendant, he was her face, he was her face, and he was her face when the defendant was her face) and the name of the diagnosis stated in the injury diagnosis statement is consistent with the victim's statement and it is sufficiently reliable.

On the other hand, G and the defendant's statements in this court and investigative agency shall be kept outside the car page in case of G.

참조조문

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2014.05.09 2013고정2450

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.13 2017고정2052

-인천지방법원 2017.06.09 2017고단1902

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.05.27 2014고정148

-제주지방법원 2015.08.13 2015노268