(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.05.09 2013고정2450

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.05.09 2013고정2450

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 6, 2013, at around 01:30, the Defendant, at around 01:30, committed assault on the part of the Defendant, on the ground that the Defendant, who was under the influence of alcohol, such as the victim D (the age of 23) at around 01:30, was “a person who makes a telephone call with another person,” making it “a person who makes a telephone call with another person,” and used the Defendant’s cell phone to cut off the Defendant’s cell phone at three times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the first protocol of trial;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the statement of witness E in the second protocol of trial;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. The portion not guilty of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse;

1. The summary of this part of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant and E, at the time and place of the facts charged as indicated in the judgment, took the Defendant’s cell phone away from the Defendant; (b) 3 times the victim’s cell phone lives, and E, which was adjacent to the victim, took the face of the victim by drinking.

As a result, the defendant and E jointly inflicted injury on the victim, such as internal surgery, which requires approximately six weeks of treatment.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the victim was under influence of alcohol, and the victim is memorying with the fact that he or she was unable to memory the fact that he or she was in contact with the victim, the victim was also faced with the victim at the time of the victim's clock, and the victim was also faced with the victim at the time of the victim's clock, and the victim came to clock between E and the victim at the time of the victim's clock, and the victim's inner wall clocks occurred at the time of the victim's clock. In light of the above circumstances, it is recognized that the defendant at the time of the clock between E and the victim, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3...

참조조문

-형법 제69조 제2항

-형법 제70조

-형법 제260조 제1항

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 2015.04.16 2014고합286

-청주지방법원 2017.04.20 2016고단2203

-대구지방법원 2019.09.06 2018고합335

-서울서부지방법원 2019.05.02 2018고단4193

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.01.23 2012고정1773