logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2011.01.26 2010고합537
정치자금법위반 등
Text

Defendant

A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, M, M,O, P, Q, Q, S, T, V, W, Y, Z, AB, AE, AE, AE, AF, AH, AH, AI, AJ, and AL.

Reasons

A. If the support money is paid to the central party head of the supporters’ association and the City/Do party head of the City/Do party, it is due to the fact that it is reverted to the National Treasury if it is impossible to return the support money to the branch sponsored under the Political Funds Act.

Even if a supporters' association is closed, tax credit and income deduction shall not be lost, and party membership fees paid by members and support payments paid to members of the National Assembly may be deducted from the tax amount at the time of year-end

On June 9, 2009, EO (hereinafter referred to as “EO”) re-enters the notice of election of the Central Committee members and representatives in the AZ-political labor sector allocation in June 9, 2009 to EK Trade Union (hereinafter referred to as “EK”).

The phrase “” sent an official door to the contents, and the above official letter states that the central committee members and representatives assigned to EN in which EK and the instant Defendants joined as members of the EN shall not be disclosed in principle, and states that 8 and 3 representatives are assigned to EK and EN, and states that **********, among 16 members affiliated with EO, they are treated anonymously.

Unlike other franchises, the number of political parties is not specified, but in the case of representatives, 10 representatives in the case of representatives, 2 representatives in the case of representatives in the case of representatives in which 50 persons or less, 100 persons in the right of political parties, 3 representatives in the case of representatives in which 50-300 persons in the right of political parties, 50 persons or more in the right of political parties, 6 representatives in the case of 70-80 persons in the right of political parties, 90-1, 200 persons in the right of political parties, 8 representatives in the right of political parties, 10 representatives in the case of representatives in which 1,300 persons in the right of political parties, 18, 5,000 persons in the right of political parties, and 34 persons in each case.

In relation to the Defendants’ defense counsel, each evidence Nos. 1 and 2 related to the Defendants’ defense counsel (the above evidence on June 9, 2009) is evidence of unlawful collection on the ground that the files extracted from the server confiscated in the process of investigation on the official announcement as of June 18, 2009 were printed out, and its contents are not related to the above assembly and demonstration.

arrow