beta
Text
1. Defendant B, C, D, E, M, F, G, H, I, J, K, and L are punished by a fine of KRW 300,00 each.
2. The above defendants are each of the above defendants.
Reasons
A. If the support money is deposited into the head of the Tong and City/Do party, it is due to the fact that it is reverted to the National Treasury if it is impossible to return it to the portion sponsored under the Political Funds Act.
Even if a supporters' association is closed, tax credit and income deduction shall not be lost, and party membership fees paid by members and support payments paid to members of the National Assembly may be deducted from the tax amount at the time of year-end
On June 9, 2009, the AJ Trade Union (hereinafter referred to as the "AJ") sent to the AF Trade Union (hereinafter referred to as the "AF") a letter stating that "the central committee members and representatives elected in the PP in 2009," and the above public letter states that the central committee members and representatives assigned to the AI in which the Defendants joined and work as members shall not be disclosed in principle, and that eight and three representatives shall be assigned to AF and AI, while it is anonymously treated as "******", it can be identified that only AF and AI are treated as anonymous among the 16 franchises affiliated with AJ, but only AF and AI are treated as anonymous.
Unlike other franchises, the number of parties is not indicated in the number of representatives. However, for representatives, "one representative where the number of parties to each franchise is not more than 50 persons, two representatives where the 100 persons or less, three representatives where the 150-300 persons or less are the 150 persons or more, five representatives where the 500 persons or more are the 50 persons and six representatives where the 700-800 persons are the 50 persons or more, six representatives where the 900-1,200 persons are the 50 persons or more, eight representatives where the 10 persons are the 1,300 persons or more, and 18,5,000 persons or more are the 34 persons, respectively, and there is no particular measure to assign the 900 persons or more to the P Internet site. There is no reason for the PP party to take any measure against the 100 persons or more.
(AE’s statement on the date of the trial of the instant case, etc. at this Court 2010 Gohap497).