1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasons for this part of the facts of recognition are as follows, and this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

1-2,00

B. 5) The Plaintiff appealed against the appeal as follows. 5) The appellate court [Supplementary High Court 2013Nu10123] made a recommendation for the adjustment as set forth below on January 6, 2016 and January 14, 2016.

On January 7, 2016, the Plaintiff submitted a written consent of the Mediation Recommendation. On January 11, 2016, the Defendant submitted a written consent of the Mediation Recommendation (Evidence A No. 13) to the effect that “A consent is given to the Mediation Recommendation as of January 6, 2016 of the Appellate Trial.”

On January 20, 2016, the Plaintiff voluntarily withdrawn the lawsuit, and the Defendant consented thereto.

A recommendation for mediation made on January 6, 2016

1. The defendant, on January 30, 2013, revoked the decision corresponding to the requirements of military person, police officer, etc. that was made to the plaintiff.

2. If the defendant revokes the disposition stated in paragraph (1), the plaintiff immediately withdraws the lawsuit of this case, and the defendant consents to the withdrawal of the lawsuit.

Recommendations for conciliation made on January 14, 2016

1. The Defendant, on January 30, 2013, revoked the Defendant’s determination of non-conformity of persons of distinguished service to the State (a determination of non-conformity of the requirements for a person of distinguished service to the State) and the determination of non-conformity of persons eligible for veteran’s compensation (a determination of non-conformity of the requirements for a person of distinguished service to the State), and issued the relevant disposition to determine

2. The plaintiff withdraws the lawsuit of this case immediately after the defendant fulfills Paragraph 1, and the defendant consents thereto.

1-2,00

C. (1) On December 23, 2015, the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement did not meet the requirements of the former part of Article 4(1)6 of the Act on Persons of Distinguished Services to the State. However, in full view of the testimony of witnesses B of the relevant lawsuit and the result of the entrustment of appraisal by the court of the relevant lawsuit court, the difference in the Plaintiff’s instant case is a cause of performance of duties or education and training.